<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Whether register of contracts has to be maintained even though Section 299 is not applicable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10794</link>
    <description>Section 301 requires maintenance of the register of contracts for contracts to which either of two related provisions applies; exemption of one provision does not ipso facto exempt section 301. The register must be maintained if the requirement of the remaining triggering provision is attracted, even though the other provision is not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=265036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Whether register of contracts has to be maintained even though Section 299 is not applicable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10794</link>
      <description>Section 301 requires maintenance of the register of contracts for contracts to which either of two related provisions applies; exemption of one provision does not ipso facto exempt section 301. The register must be maintained if the requirement of the remaining triggering provision is attracted, even though the other provision is not applicable.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>