<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>711/CBDT.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10207</link>
    <description>When only one coparcener of a Mitakshara HUF remains, ancestral property held by that coparcener is treated as equivalent to self-acquired property, and gifts made by that sole coparcener are liable to gift-tax. This stance is to be distinguished from HUFs with multiple coparceners, where the Karta&#039;s power to make gifts is limited and different legal constraints may apply; factual circumstances suggesting a sham gift or the existence of a potential heir may restrict gifting power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=264449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>711/CBDT.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10207</link>
      <description>When only one coparcener of a Mitakshara HUF remains, ancestral property held by that coparcener is treated as equivalent to self-acquired property, and gifts made by that sole coparcener are liable to gift-tax. This stance is to be distinguished from HUFs with multiple coparceners, where the Karta&#039;s power to make gifts is limited and different legal constraints may apply; factual circumstances suggesting a sham gift or the existence of a potential heir may restrict gifting power.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>