<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court decision on Section 140A(3) holding it unconstitutional</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10097</link>
    <description>Section 140A(3) was held unconstitutional by the Madras High Court as imposing a confiscatory penalty affecting Article 19(1)(f); the Department notes the decision is adverse to revenue, has authorised a leave petition for appeal, and advises that the provision is a quasi-criminal penalty for willful default rather than compensation, recommending that the appeal be pursued and expedited without immediate amendment to the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=264339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court decision on Section 140A(3) holding it unconstitutional</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10097</link>
      <description>Section 140A(3) was held unconstitutional by the Madras High Court as imposing a confiscatory penalty affecting Article 19(1)(f); the Department notes the decision is adverse to revenue, has authorised a leave petition for appeal, and advises that the provision is a quasi-criminal penalty for willful default rather than compensation, recommending that the appeal be pursued and expedited without immediate amendment to the statute.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=10097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>