<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Filing of appeal in the Supreme Court against CEGAT Order No. 517/87-B1 passed in the case of M/s. National Insulated Cable Co. v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta - Correspondence - Reg.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=7165</link>
    <description>Appeal filed against a CEGAT order turning on whether insulating copper strips constitutes manufacture that creates a new product with a distinct name, character and use and thus warrants reclassification under a different tariff item, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s view that insulation is not manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=261432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Filing of appeal in the Supreme Court against CEGAT Order No. 517/87-B1 passed in the case of M/s. National Insulated Cable Co. v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta - Correspondence - Reg.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=7165</link>
      <description>Appeal filed against a CEGAT order turning on whether insulating copper strips constitutes manufacture that creates a new product with a distinct name, character and use and thus warrants reclassification under a different tariff item, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s view that insulation is not manufacture.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=7165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>