<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>C.E. Mineral Oil loss cases - Adjudication of - Regarding</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=6606</link>
    <description>Condonation of mineral oil losses beyond Board-prescribed percentages is not to be routinely allowed; higher losses must be supported by proper evidence and genuine justification. Appellate authorities must record adequate reasons and justifications when condoning higher loss percentages and must explain why they do not accept losses previously condoned by original adjudication, to preserve the integrity of the adjudicatory process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=260873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>C.E. Mineral Oil loss cases - Adjudication of - Regarding</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=6606</link>
      <description>Condonation of mineral oil losses beyond Board-prescribed percentages is not to be routinely allowed; higher losses must be supported by proper evidence and genuine justification. Appellate authorities must record adequate reasons and justifications when condoning higher loss percentages and must explain why they do not accept losses previously condoned by original adjudication, to preserve the integrity of the adjudicatory process.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=6606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>