<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Scope and applicability of sub-section (1) explained with reference to Tribunal decision in Lalchand Bhalla&#039;s case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=4575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that where an individual partner admits a minor to the benefits of a partnership, the minor&#039;s share of profits is subject to the income-attribution provision, and the fact that the individual&#039;s share is assessed as income of a Hindu undivided family does not exclude application of the attribution rule because the individual&#039;s status as a partner remains operative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=258888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Scope and applicability of sub-section (1) explained with reference to Tribunal decision in Lalchand Bhalla&#039;s case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=4575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that where an individual partner admits a minor to the benefits of a partnership, the minor&#039;s share of profits is subject to the income-attribution provision, and the fact that the individual&#039;s share is assessed as income of a Hindu undivided family does not exclude application of the attribution rule because the individual&#039;s status as a partner remains operative.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=4575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>