<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to provisional assessment cases</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=571</link>
    <description>The doctrine of unjust enrichment in provisional assessment and provisional payments has been referred to a larger bench for authoritative resolution after a two-judge order questioned prior three-judge conclusions. Field formations are instructed to keep all pending matters and appeals on the call book, including cases involving provisional assessments and duty paid under protest, until the larger panel rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=255212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to provisional assessment cases</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=571</link>
      <description>The doctrine of unjust enrichment in provisional assessment and provisional payments has been referred to a larger bench for authoritative resolution after a two-judge order questioned prior three-judge conclusions. Field formations are instructed to keep all pending matters and appeals on the call book, including cases involving provisional assessments and duty paid under protest, until the larger panel rules.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>