<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inconsistency between laws made by Parliament under articles 249 and 250 and laws made by the Legislatures of States</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9330</link>
    <description>States retain their constitutional legislative competence despite Parliament&#039;s powers under arts. 249 and 250. If a State provision is repugnant to a law enacted by Parliament under those articles, the parliamentary law prevails whether enacted before or after, and the inconsistent part of the State law is inoperative to the extent of the repugnancy while the parliamentary law continues to have effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:25:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=246079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistency between laws made by Parliament under articles 249 and 250 and laws made by the Legislatures of States</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9330</link>
      <description>States retain their constitutional legislative competence despite Parliament&#039;s powers under arts. 249 and 250. If a State provision is repugnant to a law enacted by Parliament under those articles, the parliamentary law prevails whether enacted before or after, and the inconsistent part of the State law is inoperative to the extent of the repugnancy while the parliamentary law continues to have effect.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:25:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>