https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237981 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the order. The supply of Fly Ash was not classified as a 'Business Support Service', and the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable. The invocation of the extended period for demand and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were not upheld. The relief granted by the adjudicating authority under Section 80 supported the decision. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237981 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the order. The supply of Fly Ash was not classified as a 'Business Support Service', and the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable. The invocation of the extended period for demand and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were not upheld. The relief granted by the adjudicating authority under Section 80 supported the decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237981