https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237977 The text examines the legality of a single national entrance test for medical and dental admissions, concluding that the Councils' statutory power to regulate standards did not extend to taking over the entire admission process. It states that compulsory NEET was treated as infringing the institutional right to admit students, including protected rights of private and minority institutions, and as invalid for failure to comply with the statutory requirement of circulating draft regulations to State Governments and considering their comments. It also notes that the special constitutional regime under Article 371D preserved the relevant State admission arrangements. A dissent is recorded in which NEET was viewed as a valid regulatory measure. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237977 The text examines the legality of a single national entrance test for medical and dental admissions, concluding that the Councils' statutory power to regulate standards did not extend to taking over the entire admission process. It states that compulsory NEET was treated as infringing the institutional right to admit students, including protected rights of private and minority institutions, and as invalid for failure to comply with the statutory requirement of circulating draft regulations to State Governments and considering their comments. It also notes that the special constitutional regime under Article 371D preserved the relevant State admission arrangements. A dissent is recorded in which NEET was viewed as a valid regulatory measure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237977