<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 431 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237976</link>
    <description>Entitlement to exemption under Section 10(23B) depended on satisfaction of the statutory conditions, including use or accumulation of income solely for development of khadi or village industries and the required approval from the Khadi and Village Industries Commission. The Court noted that the same question had already been considered in the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, where the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Consistently with that earlier approach, the appeal was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration, including the issue identified in the prior decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 431 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237976</link>
      <description>Entitlement to exemption under Section 10(23B) depended on satisfaction of the statutory conditions, including use or accumulation of income solely for development of khadi or village industries and the required approval from the Khadi and Village Industries Commission. The Court noted that the same question had already been considered in the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, where the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Consistently with that earlier approach, the appeal was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration, including the issue identified in the prior decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>