<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 430 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237975</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned AAR decision and declaring that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the proviso to Section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the sale of equity shares. The petitioner will be liable to pay tax at the rate of 10% on the long-term capital gains, as the other conditions of the proviso to Section 112(1) were satisfied. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 430 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237975</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned AAR decision and declaring that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the proviso to Section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the sale of equity shares. The petitioner will be liable to pay tax at the rate of 10% on the long-term capital gains, as the other conditions of the proviso to Section 112(1) were satisfied. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>