<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 387 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the applicant&#039;s request for a full waiver of tax amounting to Rs.76,24,217/- due to the denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods received before the introduction of the levy on renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely document submission and accurate declaration in returns, affirming that credit cannot be availed on goods received before the service became taxable. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.30,00,000/- within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 387 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the applicant&#039;s request for a full waiver of tax amounting to Rs.76,24,217/- due to the denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods received before the introduction of the levy on renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely document submission and accurate declaration in returns, affirming that credit cannot be availed on goods received before the service became taxable. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.30,00,000/- within eight weeks, with the remaining dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>