<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237925</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the assessment of income from the Anna Salai property as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; and remanded the matter for the Kottivakkam property to verify the lease details. The court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, rejecting the argument of a mere change of opinion. The appeals were partly allowed for certain properties and dismissed for others, with a remand for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237925</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the assessment of income from the Anna Salai property as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; and remanded the matter for the Kottivakkam property to verify the lease details. The court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, rejecting the argument of a mere change of opinion. The appeals were partly allowed for certain properties and dismissed for others, with a remand for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>