<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237911</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to refer valuation to the Valuation Officer. The Court clarified that Section 142A does not apply to assessments finalized before 30.9.2004. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 366 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237911</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to refer valuation to the Valuation Officer. The Court clarified that Section 142A does not apply to assessments finalized before 30.9.2004. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>