https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237910 A consent decree requiring defendants to sell and convey land on demand was treated as enforceable from the date it was passed for Article 136 limitation purposes. A collateral stipulation to obtain a Section 230-A Income Tax Act certificate did not postpone enforceability or operate as a condition precedent suspending limitation, because the decree itself did not defer enforcement to a future date or contingent event. Section 18 of the Limitation Act was held inapplicable to extend limitation in execution, and later payments did not save the decree-holder's right to execute. Execution in respect of the conveyance was therefore barred by limitation. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237910 A consent decree requiring defendants to sell and convey land on demand was treated as enforceable from the date it was passed for Article 136 limitation purposes. A collateral stipulation to obtain a Section 230-A Income Tax Act certificate did not postpone enforceability or operate as a condition precedent suspending limitation, because the decree itself did not defer enforcement to a future date or contingent event. Section 18 of the Limitation Act was held inapplicable to extend limitation in execution, and later payments did not save the decree-holder's right to execute. Execution in respect of the conveyance was therefore barred by limitation. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237910