<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 352 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on both the timeliness of the appeal and the admissibility of the reduced penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial justice over procedural technicalities, ensuring that the Respondent was not unduly penalized due to procedural lapses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 352 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on both the timeliness of the appeal and the admissibility of the reduced penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial justice over procedural technicalities, ensuring that the Respondent was not unduly penalized due to procedural lapses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>