https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237878 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of Cenvat credit by the Department, which was based on excess duty paid by the supplier. The court, relying on legal precedents, held that Cenvat credit at the recipient's end cannot be denied based on duty reassessment at the supplier's end. Consequently, the court waived the requirement of pre-deposit for the Cenvat credit demand, interest, and penalty, allowing the stay application and halting the recovery during the appeal proceedings. This case underscores the importance of established legal principles and precedent in supporting the appellant's position in Cenvat credit disputes. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 05:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237878 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of Cenvat credit by the Department, which was based on excess duty paid by the supplier. The court, relying on legal precedents, held that Cenvat credit at the recipient's end cannot be denied based on duty reassessment at the supplier's end. Consequently, the court waived the requirement of pre-deposit for the Cenvat credit demand, interest, and penalty, allowing the stay application and halting the recovery during the appeal proceedings. This case underscores the importance of established legal principles and precedent in supporting the appellant's position in Cenvat credit disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237878