<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 322 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237867</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s remand order related to the eligibility for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The court found that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction in the transfer pricing matter, which had been reviewed by the Dispute Resolution Panel. Consequently, the court remanded the issue for a fresh examination on its merits, dissolving all previous interim orders and directing the Tribunal to expedite the hearing. The court did not address the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal due to the remand order being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 322 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237867</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s remand order related to the eligibility for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The court found that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction in the transfer pricing matter, which had been reviewed by the Dispute Resolution Panel. Consequently, the court remanded the issue for a fresh examination on its merits, dissolving all previous interim orders and directing the Tribunal to expedite the hearing. The court did not address the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal due to the remand order being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>