<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 320 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237865</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s orders under sections 154 and 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate any mistakes in the assessment order or provide evidence for claimed deductions. The court emphasized the requirement for taxpayers to furnish proof of actual payments to claim deductions, and dismissed the writ petition for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 320 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237865</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s orders under sections 154 and 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate any mistakes in the assessment order or provide evidence for claimed deductions. The court emphasized the requirement for taxpayers to furnish proof of actual payments to claim deductions, and dismissed the writ petition for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>