<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 312 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, determining that the assessee had disclosed all material facts during the original assessment, making the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 unwarranted. The appeal by the revenue regarding the disclosure of material facts for Assessment Year 1995-96 was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 312 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, determining that the assessee had disclosed all material facts during the original assessment, making the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 unwarranted. The appeal by the revenue regarding the disclosure of material facts for Assessment Year 1995-96 was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>