<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 306 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237851</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the disallowance of commission expenses, claim of depreciation on intangible assets (software), and addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2005-06. The Court found no substantial question of law or illegality warranting interference, emphasizing factual evidence, proper maintenance of accounts, compliance with legal requirements, and applicability of relevant legal principles. Consequently, the disallowance of commission expenses, claim of depreciation on intangible assets, and addition under section 68 were deemed justified, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 306 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237851</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the disallowance of commission expenses, claim of depreciation on intangible assets (software), and addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2005-06. The Court found no substantial question of law or illegality warranting interference, emphasizing factual evidence, proper maintenance of accounts, compliance with legal requirements, and applicability of relevant legal principles. Consequently, the disallowance of commission expenses, claim of depreciation on intangible assets, and addition under section 68 were deemed justified, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>