https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237846 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the value of materials supplied by customers must be included in the taxable value for construction projects, rejecting the applicant's argument for abatement under notifications 15/04-ST and 1/06-ST. The Tribunal also upheld the time-barred demand due to invoking the extended period of limitation, directing a pre-deposit of Rs.1,50,000 for appeal admission while staying the collection of balance dues during the appeal process. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Oct 2013 08:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237846 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the value of materials supplied by customers must be included in the taxable value for construction projects, rejecting the applicant's argument for abatement under notifications 15/04-ST and 1/06-ST. The Tribunal also upheld the time-barred demand due to invoking the extended period of limitation, directing a pre-deposit of Rs.1,50,000 for appeal admission while staying the collection of balance dues during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237846