<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings to the petitioner. The adjudication order confirming service tax liability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; for two periods was challenged. The Tribunal disagreed with the authority&#039;s reasoning, finding errors and supporting the petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding service provision to overseas companies. Additionally, the disallowance of CENVAT credit was deemed unsustainable, and interest payment for delayed service tax was accepted. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the Tribunal concluded a strong prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, leading to the relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings to the petitioner. The adjudication order confirming service tax liability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; for two periods was challenged. The Tribunal disagreed with the authority&#039;s reasoning, finding errors and supporting the petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding service provision to overseas companies. Additionally, the disallowance of CENVAT credit was deemed unsustainable, and interest payment for delayed service tax was accepted. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the Tribunal concluded a strong prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, leading to the relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>