<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 285 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237830</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeal to consider the disallowance of the provision for a contractual obligation, finding it unjustified and allowing the provision. However, the Court found no substantial question of law regarding the treatment of expenditure on issuing bonds, aligning with previous decisions on the matter. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations of relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 285 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237830</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeal to consider the disallowance of the provision for a contractual obligation, finding it unjustified and allowing the provision. However, the Court found no substantial question of law regarding the treatment of expenditure on issuing bonds, aligning with previous decisions on the matter. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations of relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>