<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 284 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237829</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment without prior approval, rendering the notice invalid. Despite finding in favor of the revenue regarding the validity of the notice and considering the excise duty refund as income, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of jurisdiction in issuing the notice for reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 284 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237829</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment without prior approval, rendering the notice invalid. Despite finding in favor of the revenue regarding the validity of the notice and considering the excise duty refund as income, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of jurisdiction in issuing the notice for reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>