<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 282 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237827</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of cash payments exceeding Rs.10,000 made by a sugar manufacturing and trading entity for urgent supplies and excise duty payments, as instructed by the U.P. State Sugar Corporation. The Court found no legal infirmity in the deletion, stating that no substantial question of law was raised. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 282 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237827</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of cash payments exceeding Rs.10,000 made by a sugar manufacturing and trading entity for urgent supplies and excise duty payments, as instructed by the U.P. State Sugar Corporation. The Court found no legal infirmity in the deletion, stating that no substantial question of law was raised. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>