<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 277 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC and penalty under Section 271(1)(c). It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowance under Section 14A and de-merger expenses. The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on prior period expenses, confirming partial disallowance. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, providing relief on the disallowance under Section 14A but upholding the disallowance of de-merger and prior period expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 277 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC and penalty under Section 271(1)(c). It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowance under Section 14A and de-merger expenses. The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on prior period expenses, confirming partial disallowance. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, providing relief on the disallowance under Section 14A but upholding the disallowance of de-merger and prior period expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>