<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 275 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for non-disclosure of capital gains. The Tribunal held that the penalty was justified as the capital gain was disclosed only after being confronted by the Department, and the revised return was not filed voluntarily before detection by the A.O. The Tribunal applied principles from a previous case to support the penalty imposition, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue on 04-10-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 275 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for non-disclosure of capital gains. The Tribunal held that the penalty was justified as the capital gain was disclosed only after being confronted by the Department, and the revised return was not filed voluntarily before detection by the A.O. The Tribunal applied principles from a previous case to support the penalty imposition, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue on 04-10-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>