https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237817 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act is confined to the narrow exceptional categories recognised in Alka Subhash Gadia. The Court held that the petitioner's objections of wrong person, wrong purpose, and vague or irrelevant grounds all raised disputed questions of fact, not a basis for pre-execution quashing. The record showed a sufficient nexus between the petitioner, the consignment, the supporting documents, his conduct during investigation, and past smuggling antecedents. The detention proposal was directed to prevent future smuggling activity, so none of the exceptional grounds for interference was established and the order was not liable to be quashed. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Oct 2013 06:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237817 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act is confined to the narrow exceptional categories recognised in Alka Subhash Gadia. The Court held that the petitioner's objections of wrong person, wrong purpose, and vague or irrelevant grounds all raised disputed questions of fact, not a basis for pre-execution quashing. The record showed a sufficient nexus between the petitioner, the consignment, the supporting documents, his conduct during investigation, and past smuggling antecedents. The detention proposal was directed to prevent future smuggling activity, so none of the exceptional grounds for interference was established and the order was not liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237817