<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237816</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Government of India&#039;s order rejecting a rebate claim, citing procedural flaws and lack of consideration for previous orders. The court directed a fresh order to be issued, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and proper evaluation of all relevant factors. The decision aimed to rectify the shortcomings in the process and ensure justice in the matter of the rebate claim rejection, with both parties retaining their contentions open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237816</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Government of India&#039;s order rejecting a rebate claim, citing procedural flaws and lack of consideration for previous orders. The court directed a fresh order to be issued, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and proper evaluation of all relevant factors. The decision aimed to rectify the shortcomings in the process and ensure justice in the matter of the rebate claim rejection, with both parties retaining their contentions open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>