https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237813 The Commissioner (Appeals) rightly rejected the appeal as time-barred due to a delay of 24 days in filing the appeal, which was not condoned. The appellant's failure to provide sufficient evidence and a serious explanation for the delay led to the dismissal of the appeal and stay application. The case emphasizes the necessity of presenting valid justifications supported by documentary evidence when seeking condonation of delay before appellate authorities. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237813 The Commissioner (Appeals) rightly rejected the appeal as time-barred due to a delay of 24 days in filing the appeal, which was not condoned. The appellant's failure to provide sufficient evidence and a serious explanation for the delay led to the dismissal of the appeal and stay application. The case emphasizes the necessity of presenting valid justifications supported by documentary evidence when seeking condonation of delay before appellate authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237813