<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 254 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237799</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed amounts, interest, and penalties regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on document processing service charges for the rebate claim. The decision was based on the interpretation of the input services definition applicable during the relevant period, emphasizing the importance of the services in relation to manufacturing activities and the broad interpretation of input services before the regulatory amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 254 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237799</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of confirmed amounts, interest, and penalties regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on document processing service charges for the rebate claim. The decision was based on the interpretation of the input services definition applicable during the relevant period, emphasizing the importance of the services in relation to manufacturing activities and the broad interpretation of input services before the regulatory amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>