<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 250 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237795</link>
    <description>A Board clarification was treated as prima facie undermining invocation of the extended period of limitation for demanding service tax where the assessee had acted in line with that clarification. The Tribunal also noted prior orders following the same clarification and found the extended-period objection prima facie in favour of the assessee. On interim relief, it considered the amount already deposited during investigation and directed only a further partial pre-deposit, with the balance demand stayed subject to compliance pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 250 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237795</link>
      <description>A Board clarification was treated as prima facie undermining invocation of the extended period of limitation for demanding service tax where the assessee had acted in line with that clarification. The Tribunal also noted prior orders following the same clarification and found the extended-period objection prima facie in favour of the assessee. On interim relief, it considered the amount already deposited during investigation and directed only a further partial pre-deposit, with the balance demand stayed subject to compliance pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>