<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 248 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237793</link>
    <description>The Commission found merit in the appellant&#039;s claims of denial of information, delay in providing information, and alleged mala fide conduct by the CPIO. A show cause notice was issued to the CPIO for a possible penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act based on prima facie evidence presented during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 248 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237793</link>
      <description>The Commission found merit in the appellant&#039;s claims of denial of information, delay in providing information, and alleged mala fide conduct by the CPIO. A show cause notice was issued to the CPIO for a possible penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act based on prima facie evidence presented during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>