<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the import of GSM Dual SIM Mobile Phones with one IMEI number instead of two, which triggered confiscation under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the handsets were not prohibited under the DGFT notification and set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed by lower authorities. The decision emphasized adherence to regulatory provisions and limited authority of customs officials in enforcing penalties for alleged violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the import of GSM Dual SIM Mobile Phones with one IMEI number instead of two, which triggered confiscation under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the handsets were not prohibited under the DGFT notification and set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed by lower authorities. The decision emphasized adherence to regulatory provisions and limited authority of customs officials in enforcing penalties for alleged violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>