https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237784 A caveat under Section 148A CPC entitles the caveator to notice of hearing, but a failure to serve such notice does not automatically render Company Law Board proceedings a nullity or destroy jurisdiction. Interference is warranted only where the caveator shows specific prejudice or special damage; here, no order was passed against the caveators and no such prejudice was established. The availability of an alternate statutory remedy under the Companies Act, 1956 also made writ intervention inappropriate. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable on that ground. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 07:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237784 A caveat under Section 148A CPC entitles the caveator to notice of hearing, but a failure to serve such notice does not automatically render Company Law Board proceedings a nullity or destroy jurisdiction. Interference is warranted only where the caveator shows specific prejudice or special damage; here, no order was passed against the caveators and no such prejudice was established. The availability of an alternate statutory remedy under the Companies Act, 1956 also made writ intervention inappropriate. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable on that ground. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237784