<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237773</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the respondent company, Mira Exim Limited, stating that they are entitled to claim depreciation on imported motor cars as they were acquired after the cut-off date of 1st April 2001. The tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, and the appeals by the Revenue were dismissed. The court&#039;s interpretation of the term &quot;acquired&quot; and the legal implications of merger or amalgamation as a transfer were crucial in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237773</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the respondent company, Mira Exim Limited, stating that they are entitled to claim depreciation on imported motor cars as they were acquired after the cut-off date of 1st April 2001. The tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, and the appeals by the Revenue were dismissed. The court&#039;s interpretation of the term &quot;acquired&quot; and the legal implications of merger or amalgamation as a transfer were crucial in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>