<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 215 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237760</link>
    <description>Receipts from marketing and management services performed outside India were treated as not attributable to a permanent establishment in India on factual findings, and the force of attraction theory was not accepted on the record. Reimbursement of lease line charges on a cost-to-cost basis was also found not to be royalty or income attributable to a permanent establishment, as no income element arose from that component. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was held inapplicable to a non-resident where the income was subject to tax deduction at source. The note also records that some questions were not entertained on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 215 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237760</link>
      <description>Receipts from marketing and management services performed outside India were treated as not attributable to a permanent establishment in India on factual findings, and the force of attraction theory was not accepted on the record. Reimbursement of lease line charges on a cost-to-cost basis was also found not to be royalty or income attributable to a permanent establishment, as no income element arose from that component. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was held inapplicable to a non-resident where the income was subject to tax deduction at source. The note also records that some questions were not entertained on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>