<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 209 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to determine the net profit rate at 8% for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order for all relevant years. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision and noted that the CIT(A) had addressed the concerns raised by the assessee regarding turnover duplication. The revenue did not challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 209 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to determine the net profit rate at 8% for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order for all relevant years. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision and noted that the CIT(A) had addressed the concerns raised by the assessee regarding turnover duplication. The revenue did not challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>