<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 204 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were not applicable due to section 80 provisions. The appellant&#039;s genuine payment efforts and lack of intent to evade tax obligations led to the setting aside of penalties imposed by lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 204 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were not applicable due to section 80 provisions. The appellant&#039;s genuine payment efforts and lack of intent to evade tax obligations led to the setting aside of penalties imposed by lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>