https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237732 The judge set aside the lower authorities' decisions and allowed the appeal regarding a stay application for the waiver of a substantial service tax amount. The judge disagreed with the first appellate authority's ruling that deemed the appeal infructuous due to perceived repetition, emphasizing that such repetition does not automatically make an appeal irrelevant. Since the appellant had already initiated another appeal on a similar order before the Tribunal, the judge found no justification to uphold the lower authorities' decisions. Consequently, the judge allowed the appeal to proceed. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237732 The judge set aside the lower authorities' decisions and allowed the appeal regarding a stay application for the waiver of a substantial service tax amount. The judge disagreed with the first appellate authority's ruling that deemed the appeal infructuous due to perceived repetition, emphasizing that such repetition does not automatically make an appeal irrelevant. Since the appellant had already initiated another appeal on a similar order before the Tribunal, the judge found no justification to uphold the lower authorities' decisions. Consequently, the judge allowed the appeal to proceed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237732