<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal regarding short landing of import goods under section 129A of the Customs Act. The judge dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the jurisdictional objection raised by the Assistant Revenue, stating that the bar on jurisdiction applies regardless of the specific sections under which the orders were passed. The appellant was granted liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate authority, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed procedures in Customs Act cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal regarding short landing of import goods under section 129A of the Customs Act. The judge dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the jurisdictional objection raised by the Assistant Revenue, stating that the bar on jurisdiction applies regardless of the specific sections under which the orders were passed. The appellant was granted liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate authority, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed procedures in Customs Act cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>