<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 173 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237718</link>
    <description>Credit under indirect tax law could not be denied merely because the supplier had not availed the exemption notification, at least at the prima facie stage. The Tribunal held that this objection was insufficient to defeat the applicants&#039; claim for interim relief and found that they were entitled to protection pending the appeals. As a result, waiver of predeposit was granted and recovery proceedings were stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 173 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237718</link>
      <description>Credit under indirect tax law could not be denied merely because the supplier had not availed the exemption notification, at least at the prima facie stage. The Tribunal held that this objection was insufficient to defeat the applicants&#039; claim for interim relief and found that they were entitled to protection pending the appeals. As a result, waiver of predeposit was granted and recovery proceedings were stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>