<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 159 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237704</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act in a Tax Appeal. The penalties were deleted regarding commission payments and expenditure on marketing expenses to the holding company. The Court agreed with the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal that there was no concealment or furnishment of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Court emphasized that the disallowance of claims does not automatically imply concealment of income, leading to the conclusion that penalties were not justified in this case. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 159 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237704</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-Tax Act in a Tax Appeal. The penalties were deleted regarding commission payments and expenditure on marketing expenses to the holding company. The Court agreed with the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal that there was no concealment or furnishment of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The Court emphasized that the disallowance of claims does not automatically imply concealment of income, leading to the conclusion that penalties were not justified in this case. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>