<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 147 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237692</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition of Rs. 5,900,262 by the Assessing Officer as the land in question was considered stock-in-trade, exempt from capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld by the High Court, emphasizing that Section 50C&#039;s provisions do not apply to lands held as stock-in-trade. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide evidence beyond juntry rates to challenge the sale consideration further supported the conclusion that the land was not subject to capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was justified, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 147 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237692</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition of Rs. 5,900,262 by the Assessing Officer as the land in question was considered stock-in-trade, exempt from capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld by the High Court, emphasizing that Section 50C&#039;s provisions do not apply to lands held as stock-in-trade. The Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to provide evidence beyond juntry rates to challenge the sale consideration further supported the conclusion that the land was not subject to capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was justified, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>