<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237684</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the appellant provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the delay condonation application was erroneous. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the previous order was set aside. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was instructed to decide the appeal on its merits in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237684</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the appellant provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the delay condonation application was erroneous. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the previous order was set aside. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was instructed to decide the appeal on its merits in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>