https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237672 The Court directed respondents 1 and 2 to prevent obstruction in the commissioning of the telecommunication tower erected by the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with permits and licenses. Despite the absence of counter affidavits from respondents, the Court highlighted the lack of conclusive evidence on health impacts of telecommunication towers and stressed the importance of regulatory compliance. The judgment aimed to ensure the petitioner's rights were upheld and facilitate the smooth operation of the telecommunication infrastructure without hindrance. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2013 02:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237672 The Court directed respondents 1 and 2 to prevent obstruction in the commissioning of the telecommunication tower erected by the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with permits and licenses. Despite the absence of counter affidavits from respondents, the Court highlighted the lack of conclusive evidence on health impacts of telecommunication towers and stressed the importance of regulatory compliance. The judgment aimed to ensure the petitioner's rights were upheld and facilitate the smooth operation of the telecommunication infrastructure without hindrance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237672