<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 126 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237671</link>
    <description>Regulation of the location of a country liquor shop in a residential area was upheld where the shop was near a newly developed residential building and complaints of nuisance and public inconvenience were raised. The Court treated renewal of the licence as a fresh grant, so the distance restriction under Rule 5(4) of the U.P. Number and Location of Excise Shops (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2008 applied. It held that public interest is a relevant consideration in controlling liquor shop location and that there is no fundamental right to trade in liquor in a manner contrary to lawful restrictions and residential convenience. The relocation direction was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 126 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237671</link>
      <description>Regulation of the location of a country liquor shop in a residential area was upheld where the shop was near a newly developed residential building and complaints of nuisance and public inconvenience were raised. The Court treated renewal of the licence as a fresh grant, so the distance restriction under Rule 5(4) of the U.P. Number and Location of Excise Shops (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2008 applied. It held that public interest is a relevant consideration in controlling liquor shop location and that there is no fundamental right to trade in liquor in a manner contrary to lawful restrictions and residential convenience. The relocation direction was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>