<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 124 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237669</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s restoration application in a tax appeal case. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s prolonged non-compliance with predeposit orders and significant delay in depositing the required amount. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Delhi High Court judgment was supported, stating that once an interim order merges with a High Court decision, the Tribunal loses authority to restore the appeal. The court highlighted the appellant&#039;s delayed compliance and upheld the dismissal of the restoration application, ultimately dismissing the tax appeal and civil application for stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=200076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 124 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237669</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s restoration application in a tax appeal case. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s prolonged non-compliance with predeposit orders and significant delay in depositing the required amount. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a Delhi High Court judgment was supported, stating that once an interim order merges with a High Court decision, the Tribunal loses authority to restore the appeal. The court highlighted the appellant&#039;s delayed compliance and upheld the dismissal of the restoration application, ultimately dismissing the tax appeal and civil application for stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>